Information on Result #484326

There is no (163, 215, 46500)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 811770 277631 625582 499473 761652 388990 969396 601363 382731 238844 230543 161549 963754 719431 124135 941097 638521 > 3215

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 216, 46500)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction