Information on Result #484356

There is no (92, 216, 491)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11 443905 466647 974629 000933 054699 981425 403593 935018 544625 019336 514098 409112 119895 341382 489417 729055 694333 > 3216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 217, 491)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction