Information on Result #484362

There is no (104, 216, 698)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11 733783 077286 363345 739053 119700 044540 552489 858533 174163 606308 085705 417455 177981 966466 740519 731749 325489 > 3216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 217, 698)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction