Information on Result #484374

There is no (128, 216, 1855)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11 658719 014107 321104 658249 292322 544549 963747 834412 297137 924960 930180 217148 009010 488563 028731 151584 564137 > 3216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 217, 1855)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction