Information on Result #484378

There is no (136, 216, 2934)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11 455174 666788 718625 765439 265971 159230 044865 985092 451128 172947 697889 625131 105410 603649 142822 932654 366737 > 3216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 217, 2934)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction