Information on Result #484390

There is no (160, 216, 27052)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11 445420 967226 025207 005144 015343 425445 280986 796763 812030 613535 401727 492640 522724 183965 021343 252008 486977 > 3216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 217, 27052)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction