Information on Result #484420

There is no (89, 217, 452)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 37 934997 802926 379041 335350 535977 387985 252229 444128 872652 480883 961992 710024 747165 225643 649261 025087 613441 > 3217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 218, 452)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction