Information on Result #484423

There is no (95, 217, 529)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 35 161296 807182 279477 165241 479463 786416 167728 045836 967302 544682 519991 719720 280401 056572 410217 172859 046451 > 3217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 218, 529)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction