Information on Result #484440

There is no (129, 217, 1903)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 34 992793 528158 078897 135742 219220 546835 596167 035489 206746 366625 352862 829495 218837 372803 951747 580146 170025 > 3217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 218, 1903)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction