Information on Result #484441

There is no (131, 217, 2117)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 34 462254 459785 609565 329216 597346 370366 053304 186839 021766 466733 203230 901445 311089 264628 669540 941616 404875 > 3217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 218, 2117)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction