Information on Result #484443

There is no (135, 217, 2665)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 34 538030 275164 965950 794414 152450 272730 690082 649992 906902 496741 588521 946650 436665 247082 049649 965304 111795 > 3217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 218, 2665)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction