Information on Result #484456

There is no (161, 217, 28135)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 34 315311 422435 769979 598260 507370 357939 444422 438229 575465 905673 801187 660913 428846 196980 044990 242557 390793 > 3217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 218, 28135)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction