Information on Result #484484

There is no (86, 218, 417)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 108 604335 162354 339866 246821 156794 622310 138888 146357 271006 662231 731016 942694 783974 938469 894296 176270 396745 > 3218

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 219, 417)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction