Information on Result #484492
There is no (102, 218, 642)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 104 256592 040997 217720 146263 984500 807619 630163 646579 405882 756996 258625 733113 804759 794652 050945 467708 394821 > 3218
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (102, 219, 642)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |