Information on Result #484497

There is no (112, 218, 894)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 106 991681 312435 829048 463866 296235 282050 317930 188774 747942 189617 799763 888095 441562 098745 197050 264575 702965 > 3218

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (112, 219, 894)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction