Information on Result #484505
There is no (128, 218, 1762)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 105 041752 129514 456384 131741 850480 102055 094429 145662 646282 130483 107353 553994 885657 257130 678745 316375 658957 > 3218
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (128, 219, 1762)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |