Information on Result #484505

There is no (128, 218, 1762)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 105 041752 129514 456384 131741 850480 102055 094429 145662 646282 130483 107353 553994 885657 257130 678745 316375 658957 > 3218

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 219, 1762)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction