Information on Result #484506
There is no (130, 218, 1952)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 104 532344 710845 309336 751903 754494 826569 122800 272170 586275 366315 968919 915965 181037 873948 451070 553143 699201 > 3218
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (130, 219, 1952)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |