Information on Result #484572

There is no (129, 219, 1806)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 310 377755 460213 101974 780013 989257 230817 435643 395638 861339 023290 307712 837427 229444 700622 350657 107938 189669 > 3219

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 220, 1806)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction