Information on Result #484573

There is no (131, 219, 2002)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 310 693126 704103 047404 811747 026511 195425 339072 486622 905255 074052 926864 668512 731484 138773 024986 929391 354297 > 3219

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 220, 2002)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction