Information on Result #484589

There is no (163, 219, 30434)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 308 838122 077968 926284 519514 046926 292893 076367 028636 168163 138850 968732 766055 439366 607099 239485 323939 386905 > 3219

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 220, 30434)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction