Information on Result #484638

There is no (128, 220, 1678)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 946 237626 658741 394311 131178 378576 602645 346413 304269 596602 724874 140237 236811 604981 170990 327513 793858 499029 > 3220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 221, 1678)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction