Information on Result #484654

There is no (160, 220, 18966)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 926 293379 986938 559706 612402 622305 909190 473800 478478 432451 309541 228054 499014 136696 522740 915181 433209 053541 > 3220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 221, 18966)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction