Information on Result #484656
There is no (164, 220, 31653)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 926 556679 559007 565989 941893 036451 930827 848991 719195 321835 276965 655896 681040 622241 466183 678380 840204 555505 > 3220
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 221, 31653)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |