Information on Result #484722

There is no (161, 221, 19675)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2780 930756 275278 155055 417331 366252 015440 231158 644244 747652 828835 521801 073938 457244 973832 737230 186135 967645 > 3221

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 222, 19675)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction