Information on Result #484773

There is no (128, 222, 1602)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 8555 529362 062935 645333 446675 822155 511733 363038 415636 774538 617508 993484 523806 081038 203674 012790 543223 823961 > 3222

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 223, 1602)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction