Information on Result #484841

There is no (129, 223, 1641)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25693 705252 489619 214396 155615 731028 358781 618873 831464 458695 448996 755667 916704 990277 120298 178769 498078 110091 > 3223

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 224, 1641)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction