Information on Result #484857

There is no (161, 223, 16766)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25042 183131 314972 000297 223801 560169 974737 325340 153706 530283 452186 600440 412942 578505 954116 760697 274128 763081 > 3223

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 224, 16766)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction