Information on Result #484858

There is no (163, 223, 21172)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25016 520707 879780 494841 350553 566237 956548 794773 429664 678414 065225 090110 656612 702210 792063 688016 216359 055865 > 3223

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 224, 21172)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction