Information on Result #484859

There is no (165, 223, 27198)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25008 517558 981443 288246 807115 174326 665204 208698 005765 349429 924975 269879 430365 218811 890658 558762 271160 906853 > 3223

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 224, 27198)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction