Information on Result #484893

There is no (96, 224, 517)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 82069 212429 055194 369162 676272 678449 597757 688698 974649 914774 218539 498947 580188 859036 669670 126131 219654 844161 > 3224

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 225, 517)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction