Information on Result #484910

There is no (130, 224, 1680)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 75245 595091 625178 076589 406726 916423 853281 379891 450343 209523 091492 753224 496895 960591 772044 695515 577616 198337 > 3224

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 225, 1680)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction