Information on Result #484958

There is no (89, 225, 432)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 231496 928408 517084 521892 103982 208489 819528 226914 353518 320638 683216 537486 324653 443540 250706 701846 793860 077697 > 3225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 226, 432)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction