Information on Result #484980

There is no (133, 225, 1896)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 227304 694002 807314 157216 227738 950825 780066 056266 048624 112969 639847 972760 953718 652603 872945 910284 926774 689009 > 3225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 226, 1896)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction