Information on Result #484995

There is no (163, 225, 17999)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 225105 538784 486822 131087 931916 629357 291329 332526 942095 654285 409670 411286 185502 399372 129697 459800 543361 533699 > 3225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 226, 17999)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction