Information on Result #485041

There is no (116, 226, 921)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 676477 846269 673730 630681 464804 168281 844032 399730 165139 820457 124095 518430 183032 934151 878798 306336 729045 284651 > 3226

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 227, 921)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction