Information on Result #485048

There is no (130, 226, 1606)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 678989 853459 482661 276814 271829 226543 157384 599840 493124 987767 915262 083006 320949 913323 093131 612125 510599 311329 > 3226

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 227, 1606)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction