Information on Result #485065

There is no (164, 226, 18650)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 675984 127398 290053 696020 235450 354388 619764 594691 718729 143887 817539 560438 833721 441757 743386 453986 619098 052633 > 3226

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 227, 18650)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction