Information on Result #485118
There is no (131, 227, 1645)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 080453 121643 495994 408669 084758 864627 472898 345747 664268 910404 458713 442353 815004 320640 576952 306287 264040 519489 > 3227
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (131, 228, 1645)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |