Information on Result #485118

There is no (131, 227, 1645)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 080453 121643 495994 408669 084758 864627 472898 345747 664268 910404 458713 442353 815004 320640 576952 306287 264040 519489 > 3227

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 228, 1645)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction