Information on Result #485135

There is no (165, 227, 19324)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 028312 110469 510870 506898 691301 613756 545597 841758 538028 607728 052862 710323 713609 094726 156836 525304 978346 234193 > 3227

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 228, 19324)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction