Information on Result #485259

There is no (135, 229, 1894)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 18 317019 193859 288843 302179 663322 872336 189936 133382 784224 650630 349843 454860 189904 521432 050961 684854 312005 513993 > 3229

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 230, 1894)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction