Information on Result #485272
There is no (161, 229, 11033)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 18 245199 528519 348778 307884 194907 831443 408218 263688 018501 021316 516599 436220 539972 007697 945141 032180 564811 763705 > 3229
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (161, 230, 11033)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |