Information on Result #485273

There is no (163, 229, 13435)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 18 270053 697492 360829 406863 181129 632535 001495 853065 079045 409688 812511 068869 363557 689523 899021 797533 730900 402615 > 3229

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 230, 13435)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction