Information on Result #485274

There is no (165, 229, 16574)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 18 231813 188459 496013 961756 160336 594319 174043 584190 633850 690806 222690 343760 463576 197304 217140 137675 239638 865729 > 3229

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 230, 16574)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction