Information on Result #485342

There is no (162, 230, 11397)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 54 830233 944323 010948 533667 407269 531518 535199 197068 607121 884801 013079 569898 392967 221109 563594 919500 167397 139921 > 3230

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (162, 231, 11397)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction