Information on Result #485345

There is no (168, 230, 21495)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 54 757990 606089 985408 614894 098869 509525 958200 999269 344027 491111 676221 643335 745188 954201 990204 364968 156976 749219 > 3230

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (168, 231, 21495)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction