Information on Result #485398

There is no (133, 231, 1649)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 165 922551 656621 226743 696810 165746 544213 041156 057070 900391 771246 293119 756348 713095 627865 457046 866292 562408 469539 > 3231

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 232, 1649)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction