Information on Result #485414

There is no (165, 231, 14362)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 164 346688 023278 527737 184380 491031 369852 229672 644446 540713 964854 874058 187593 355232 432428 273224 420801 607859 633397 > 3231

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 232, 14362)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction