Information on Result #485699

There is no (165, 235, 11077)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 13298 426602 664442 752598 168224 261721 945568 780904 802927 906025 571225 309989 957176 214425 330569 537664 975500 935612 620651 > 3235

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 236, 11077)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction