Information on Result #485902

There is no (136, 238, 1623)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 361839 188491 601830 859123 828658 872923 622194 736917 723654 562542 354050 091656 182851 868715 599171 102213 655099 434506 495227 > 3238

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 239, 1623)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction