Information on Result #485990

There is no (165, 239, 8812)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 080031 110710 884721 706471 758400 596046 118209 026454 279096 176931 638029 637738 417242 010346 717082 514588 079361 248400 102329 > 3239

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 240, 8812)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction